Source review
Add signal, not volume.
MacroDigest continuously evaluates original reporting, expert analysis, official data, specialist publications, and public social context. Inclusion is based on quality and relevance, not submission order or commercial relationship.
Current registry
Counts reflect the latest completed MacroDigest edition. An input is an individual feed or public account; one publisher may provide more than one.
Suggest a source
Submit a publication, blog, newsletter feed, official institution, or public social account that consistently adds useful macro or financial-market information. Every suggestion enters the same independent quality and relevance review; submission does not guarantee inclusion.
What qualifies
Strong candidates publish original reporting, primary data, disclosed research, or informed analysis with clear subject expertise. MacroDigest also values regional and specialist sources that improve coverage beyond the largest global publications.
Topic-led discovery runs automatically as the news agenda changes. A candidate must resolve to a current first-party feed and show recurring relevant coverage before it can enter collection; newly discovered sources remain subordinate until their reporting is corroborated.
Authority reflects reliability, transparency, proximity to the event, and a record of useful work. It does not reward a political or economic viewpoint, and no source can buy inclusion or ranking priority.
How sources are used
Independent reporting on the same event strengthens corroboration. Analysis can add a distinct interpretation, while public social posts can help discover developments or show meaningful discussion. Social activity never counts as factual confirmation and cannot make a social-only story rank on the front page.
MacroDigest uses attribution, links, headlines, and short publisher-provided excerpts to send readers to original work. It does not republish full articles.